Thinking back to the first day when we drew our ideal classrooms, I
remember discussing structure as being in my dream classroom...obviously
structure is something that is important to me.
Structure is
important to me for a lot of reasons. It benefits the students because
it allows them to really know their environment, therefore allowing for
them to hold expectations. Hopefully, the knowledge, experience, and
expectations they gain from this structure produces a safe and open
environment between students and with the teacher.
Structure also
benefits the teacher. We all posses strengths and weaknesses in our
skill set, and I think things such as structured, thought out, detailed
lesson plans can help the teacher feel secure in some of those skill
areas that are lacking in comparison to the others (certainly this is
not to say we shouldn't prepare in our comfortable skill areas). I think
structure can be a teacher's friend in fortifying ideas, concepts, and
rules. This could exist, for example, in the fortification of skills we
have learned by doing multiple short activities over a period of time
focusing specifically on those recently learned skills, or
(unfortunately) in our classroom/school disciplinary structure.
I
would agree with many of colleagues in the thought that teaching is
improvisation and that flexibility in a classroom is so very valuable.
However, even improvisation usually happens within some constructs - and
those constructs (structures) are going to be the foundation for
classroom operations.
I think you have the essence of the argument. Improvisation ALWAYS happens in relation to something--procedural knowledge, classroom procedures, experience, etc...
ReplyDelete